324
alleged
dinination
and 6 of Lord Kimberley's despatch 908 20 May (3199). At final the
80
Chris Justin lumped them all under the word slavery, but
in his letter of yang be appears now to admit a distinction in favour
of adoption and well regulated
domestic service
acknowledge? Ne 21/10
In Braunton.
Jun Free
Defith mo
I kept this Paper for
the circus.
I know nothing
Rm 9/11
If 9487-9881 have come back & the depth
Su
please arment-
M. Braunton
Janser
hafer
9801
JA 11/0
but cannot find the other
EPF 11 NN
J
hur. 6
In the disp. on 9801. for funtimal the
of serious crime _ wh. was not confirmed by the year's statitis;
These sports
satisfacting, I hope the annual report
will go out a
que son is printed no 5) at p. 82 of the accompanying
proof - Par. 2 of this disp. is no real answer -
It throws us back (de M. Creaghi's Minute apo fr. 3 of tho
Endl.) upon Sir John Smale's vague assertion that these
& makes the S. G. responsible for the abominable prosecutions
Having dealing
AA
Cases are punishable which however are not authorised by any laws, Sir John has
yet answered the disp. of 20 May (fr. 81 of print) 2 but Sir John Hennessy gave
as an Evasion a
& unsatisfacting reply in 12084- which has been answered draft desp. 58- of 29. Sept-
The disp- 3199
K
12084 a draft. & This should
be added to the pink
Showed this to the hacked (2) put by, on (3) told that it is
To answer to 0831-
Think (1.): unless we ought to notice the alleged deference to The I. Govs. Vieno, I think we have not conviously been informed.
M. 19/11
I think it should notice it
Hennessy
In J. Hennessy is always thinking how he can put his best foot forward and
Per Hour.
& has various
Is there
primes
who will not be at all sorry to glorify him at the scheme of
State
The Secretary of the Brain I am not quite
Non W
I understand
Mit
if
Sin
the point at issue
324
alleged
dinination
and 6 of Lord Kimberleys despatch 908 20May (3199). At final the
голіку
80
Chris Justin lumped them all underthe word slavery, but
in his letter of yang be appears now to admit a distinction in pavour
of adoption and well regulated
Comente service
acknowledge? Ne 21/10
In Braunton.
Jun Free
Defith mo
I kept this Paperfor¬
the circus.
I know nothing
Rm 9/11
If 9487-9881 ham come back & the defph
Su
please arment-
M. Bramaton
Janser
hafer
9801
尿
JA 11/0
but cannot find the other
EPF 11 NN
J
hur. 6
In the disp. on 9801. for funtimal the
of serious crime _ wh. was not confirmed by the years statitis;
These sports
satisfacting, a Thope the annual report
with how go out a
que son is printul no 5) at p. 82 of the accompanying
proof - Par. 2 of this disp. is no real answer -
It throws us back (de M. Creaghi's Minute apo fr. 3 of tho
Endl.) upon Sir John Smales raque asention that these
& makes the 5. 05. responsible for the abremeniti prosecutions
Hlavn dealing
AA
Cases an Junishable which however are not authorised by any laws, Sir John has
yeh answered the disp. of 20 May (fr. 81 of print ) 2 buh Sie John Hennessy gam
as an Evasion a
& unsatisfacting Uply in 12084- which has been answered draft desp.58- of 29. Sept-
The disp-3199
K
-
12084 a draft. & This should
fo addue to the pink
Showed this the hacked (2) put by, on (3) told that it is
To answer to 0831-
Think (1.): unless we ought to notice the alleged deforener to The I. ops. Vieno, oposthink we have not conviously been informed_
M. 19/11
kewt noveg
I think in should notia it
Hommessy
In J. Honnorry is always, thanking how he can put his but foot farm and
Per Hour.
& has various
Is ther
primes
who will not he at all sorry to glorify him at the scheme of
State
ми? The Secretary of The Brain I am not quite
Non W
I understand
Mit
if
Sin
the point at fue
!
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.